What is the proposed dating for the gospel of john validating identy network
There is little dispute as to a common author for the short letters of 2 John and 3 John.
Both are written by a man calling himself The Elder.
Furthermore, those who were alive at the time of the events could have countered the gospel accounts; and since we have no contradictory writings to the gospels, their early authorship as well as apostolic authorship becomes even more critical. This is significant because Jesus had prophesied concerning the temple when He said "As for these things which you are looking at, the days will come in which there will not be left one stone upon another which will not be torn down." (Luke 21:6, see also Matt. Such an obvious fulfillment of Jesus' prophecy most likely would have been recorded as such by the gospel writers who were fond of mentioning fulfillment of prophecy if they had been written after A. But, it was not included suggesting that the gospels (at least Matthew, Mark, and Luke) were written before A. Acts is a history of the Christian church right after Jesus' ascension. If Q actually existed, then that would push the first writings of Christ's words and deeds back even further lessening the available time for myth to creep in and adding to the validity and accuracy of the gospel accounts. Luke is simply recounting the events from the disciples.
"Eternal life" is a phrase that occurs with disproportionate freqency in John and 1 John.
Ignatius (35-107), Papius, Iraneus and Origin (185-254) assigned John the son of Zebedee as the author of the Gospel of John.
However, Papius identifies a separate John as the writer of the letters of John and Revelation, so there is some variance in early tradition as to authorship of the Johannine letters.
Both 1 and 2 John speak of a new commandment (1 John 2:8, 2 John 5) of love.
Truth is a key concept in all three (1 John 1:6, 1:8, , , 4:6, 5:6; 2 John 1, 2, 4; 3 John 1, 3, 4, 8, 12).